---
title: "Review Methodology"
description: "The seven-factor, evidence-led method used to compare adult AI character, image and video services."
updated: "2026-09-15"
---

# Review Methodology

The seven-factor, evidence-led method used to compare adult AI character, image and video services.

## What scores mean

AI Porn Generators scores documented decision fit. The total is not a laboratory measure of beauty, realism, safety or popularity, and it cannot guarantee that a particular prompt will succeed. Its purpose is to summarize how clearly a service helps an adult move from an idea to a controlled fictional character, image or short video at a comprehensible cost.

Every product is read through the same core questions: What is the first meaningful action? Can a fictional identity remain recognizable? How much control exists over images? Is video connected to the same workflow? What does the advertised price actually buy? Are the usage boundaries clear? Which reader should choose or skip the tool?

## Seven weighted factors

The rubric totals 100 weight points. Starting workflow measures how quickly a user can understand the first real action. Character continuity covers saved identities, reference controls, context and variation tools. Image control looks at composition, style, revision and repair options. Video path distinguishes direct text-to-video, image-to-video and loosely connected motion features.

Cost clarity measures the amount billed, included units, free access and whether media uses a second currency. Safety and usage boundaries cover adult-only rules, likeness restrictions, output rights and data expectations that a reader needs before creating. Decision fit combines the practical strengths and limits for the target user rather than rewarding the longest feature list.

## Score calculation

Each criterion receives a zero-to-five value. We divide that value by five, multiply it by the criterion weight and add the weighted results. The public total is rounded to the nearest whole number. A score near the top means the documented workflow fits the comparison job well; it does not mean flawless output.

When practical performance evidence is absent, the relevant criterion receives a neutral or cautious value instead of a perfect one. Missing information also affects clarity. A product is not rewarded for a capability that appears only in vague promotional language.

## Evidence hierarchy

Current official pricing, product, help, checkout and policy pages support mutable facts. Direct observation supports what a route or interface visibly exposes. Reputable secondary reporting can identify a question but does not override a current first-party price or term without a reason.

We preserve the difference between documented capability and hands-on performance. If a service says it supports image-to-video, we may describe the path. We do not claim measured motion quality, face stability or cost per successful clip without a controlled record. Supplied editorial media on this site is never used as substitute product output.

## Comparison workflow

We normalize headline prices to US dollars and state the amount billed for annual plans. Free access is described by what can actually be inspected, not by the word “free” alone. Internal currencies are treated as part of cost because an inexpensive subscription can still make frequent image or video generation expensive.

For media workflow, we map the order from character or prompt to still image and then to optional motion. We look for tools that can reduce face drift, support deliberate revision and avoid paying for video before the source frame is acceptable. Showcase art is separated from evidence about repeatability.

The home table compares the same decision fields for all five services. Individual reviews add context, limitations and best-fit guidance. A product can lead one user job without becoming a universal winner.

## Freshness and conflicts

Current prices were checked September 15, 2026 and require a fresh review after the stated 30-day price window or sooner when a credible change is reported. Feature and policy claims are updated when source evidence changes. The review date is not a promise that every destination checkout will remain identical across regions and promotions.

The same seven factors, evidence hierarchy and limitation requirements apply to every service. No reviewed company controls the verdict. Submit evidence of an error through [corrections](/corrections/).

_Last reviewed: September 15, 2026._