---
title: "Corrections"
description: "How readers and product teams can submit evidence and how material editorial changes are reviewed and recorded."
updated: "2026-09-15"
---

# Corrections

How readers and product teams can submit evidence and how material editorial changes are reviewed and recorded.

## Submit useful evidence

Choose “Factual correction” in the form below. Include the exact AI Porn Generators page, the statement or table field at issue and an authoritative current source. For price corrections, include the currency, billing term, amount charged and date observed. For a feature or policy change, link or identify the official product, help or policy material that supports it.

Do not send passwords, payment details, identity documents, private account data or explicit attachments. A product team may explain its position, but a requested marketing preference is not automatically a factual correction.

## Our review process

We compare the report with the existing claim record and current evidence. A mutable fact normally requires a current first-party source or direct reproducible observation. Where sources conflict, the page may be updated to explain the uncertainty rather than selecting the more favorable statement without support.

Material corrections update the visible HTML, checked date, Markdown mirror and any relevant structured or machine-readable data. We do not silently replace a price in one format while leaving another stale. Small spelling or formatting fixes may not require a public note when they do not change meaning.

## Outcomes and limits

A well-supported report can change a score if it changes one of the weighted factors. Brand preference, pressure or the identity of the sender does not determine the outcome. The reviewed company does not receive final editorial approval.

The correction process applies to this publication. Account, payment or generated-output disputes inside a reviewed service must go to that operator. Copyright, likeness, privacy, NCII or suspected-minor concerns should use the [priority removal process](/content-removal/) instead of waiting for an ordinary editorial review.

_Last reviewed: September 15, 2026._